Topic outline

  • General

    Collapse all Expand all
    • Cambridge IGCSE™ Art & Design 0400
      Scope & Sequence


    • June 2021
      Notes and concepts:

      • Here we have an online version of the existing SOW
      • In this model, it is split into accordions 
      • Concept is that teacher will access the site, and be able to download the default version without any changes
      • By default you get the SOW
      • If you change anything, you get your custom version


    • Feedback:
      Change the titles around
      Include introduction - clarity about each section
      Essential to be editable


    • Cambridge IGCSE™ Art & Design 0400


    • Ideally a short, overview, visual item. The 'map' worked well, but that did focus on delivery models. Might a diagram be better, making use of the existing SOW data?

    • Suggested teaching time


    • Map vs Pie chart vs other graphic? Even user choice?

    • Teaching time Teaching time

    • Export

    • Dynamic option here - it has quick list of what you're exporting:

    • Export

    • Scheme of Work

    • Shows topics within the scheme of work - headings that reveal the content

    • Existing Scheme of Work

      Component 1 example

      Additional text and detail go here

      Component 2 example

      Text or image goes here



    • Additional depth

      Misconceptions example

      Additional text and detail go here

      Links

      Additional text and detail go here

      Keywords

      Additional text and detail go here

      Starter questions

      Additional text and detail go here

    • Additional depth - version 1


    • Include additional depth

      Select additional depth...

    • Additional depth - version 2


    • BUT - are the wider pedagogical references even needed here? How do they actually differ from what is in the existing SOW? Where do they add value?

      OR might we simply include the wider 'pedagogical theory in practice' as an option to tick?


    • Include additional depth

      Pedagogy included

    • 14 June Challenges

      If we did it this way, we could include detail - e.g. number of items added, ability to click and see the content if wanted....
      However, do we need to still provide the filter to help the teacher down to which types of pedagogy? I think we do as that is a slice that is quite likely - e.g. school focus on Metacognition or other specific focus.

      OR do we have everything as optional layers? You can even choose to 'untick' the SOW sections if you want, and just get the additional elements...

      The challenge here is that we are delivering these additional layers at the topic/section level in the SOW. This is great for teachers, but it makes it much more challenging to make it a useful item available to display online. This has to be our answer - by default you see the existing SOW. If you then opt for additional depth, those options will be revealed in the specific sections for the SOW. That then means we don't overload the teacher with content, but it *is* there...

    • Pedagogical focus


    • I think this needs to be integrated with the above - having it separate now makes no sense at all.

    • Pedagogy

    • Broader pedagogical links with reference to the subject
      - Subject specific examples (taken from the reference book materials).
      - Examples shown here, linking onto the textbook?
      - If selected, they appear within the relevant topic in the SOW? Feels cumbersome.

    • Export

    • Export

    • Training

    • Training 0400

    • Community

    • Community

    • Export


    • Further thoughts - might we also make the entire thing selectable? We have a nicely presented ticklist offering.

      What do you want to include in your Scope & Sequence?

      Full checklist

    • Export

    • Further resources


    • Links to existing other items from School Support hub

      Additional resources