Section outline
-
-
Scheme of Work
-
Shows topics within the scheme of work - headings that reveal the content
-
Existing Scheme of Work
Additional text and detail go here
Text or image goes here -
Additional depth
Additional text and detail go here
Additional text and detail go here
Additional text and detail go here
Additional text and detail go here
-
Additional depth - version 1
-
Include additional depth -
Additional depth - version 2
-
BUT - are the wider pedagogical references even needed here? How do they actually differ from what is in the existing SOW? Where do they add value?OR might we simply include the wider 'pedagogical theory in practice' as an option to tick?
-
Include additional depth -
14 June Challenges
If we did it this way, we could include detail - e.g. number of items added, ability to click and see the content if wanted....
However, do we need to still provide the filter to help the teacher down to which types of pedagogy? I think we do as that is a slice that is quite likely - e.g. school focus on Metacognition or other specific focus.
OR do we have everything as optional layers? You can even choose to 'untick' the SOW sections if you want, and just get the additional elements...
The challenge here is that we are delivering these additional layers at the topic/section level in the SOW. This is great for teachers, but it makes it much more challenging to make it a useful item available to display online. This has to be our answer - by default you see the existing SOW. If you then opt for additional depth, those options will be revealed in the specific sections for the SOW. That then means we don't overload the teacher with content, but it *is* there...
-