Topic outline

  • Cambridge International AS & A Level Drama 9482 (for examination from 2021)
    Example Candidate Responses (Component 2 Practical drama)

    • Introduction

      The main aim of this resource is to exemplify standards of Cambridge International AS & A Level Drama, Component 2 Practical drama, and show how different levels of candidates' performance relate to the subject's curriculum and assessment objectives. 

      Candidate responses have been selected from one Cambridge centre from the June 2021 series to exemplify a range of  candidate performances. All the candidates seen in the videos were contacted and they provided permissions to use the videos from their practical drama submission. 

      The videos are followed by examiner comments on how and why marks were awarded so that you can understand what candidates have done to gain their marks and what they could do to improve their performances.  

    • Assessment criteria

      • Part 1 Devised piece (30 marks)

      • Part 2 Scripted performance (30 marks) 

  • Now that you have read the assessment criteria, you may want to practise marking the performances. Watch the videos below, make a note of the strengths and weaknesses of the candidate and give a mark, before you read the examiner comments and marks below.



    • Part 1 Devised piece (30 marks)

      • Devised piece - 'Hindley Wakes'

      Teachers are advised that the devised piece is based on the life of Myra Hindley and we recognise that this is a controversial and disturbing subject. However, candidates are inspired by such events and may use the devised piece as a way of exploring difficult and challenging stories, and of tackling social and political issues. This is a feature of devised drama work at this level and, in the case of this piece, we believe it is done with integrity.

      This video has been anonymised so the candidate names have been removed at the start. The audio starts at 00:23 secs.


    • Commentary on devised piece

    • The piece lasts for approximately 17’ 30”

      There are eleven blackouts that form the structure of the devised piece. 

      There are many sections for a piece of this length. The candidates made the decision to increase the number of blackouts for dramatic intensity. However, these themselves are not well handled and tended to slow down the action of the piece.

      The piece starts with the opening image using torches and the door frame effectively to set the scene. Hindley is introduced (played by Candidate 4) Hindley has the opening monologue and the ensemble multi-role characters in her life. These are more naturalistic in style and depict her violent upbringing.

      There is a long blackout lasting 20 seconds.  The next scene starts and the ensemble stand back-to-back to recite details about the victims. They start with Candidate 1 (the candidate with the highest mark). There is then a moment of stillness and another blackout of 10 seconds.

      The ensemble alters the proxemics and stand in a line to pose the question “maybe if?” to the audience. This segues into a game show and Ian Brady is introduced, played by the only male candidate, Candidate 5.

      At the end of the scene another black-out follows and is 10 seconds long. The door frame is moved into place again. Candidate 4 continues to play Hindley and the main characters meet for the first time. The predatory nature of the relationship is explored. The ensemble adds dramatic intensity and pacing when they shout the dates of the victims’ deaths.

      There is short blackout, and the scene opens at the cinema, on their first date. The ensemble narrates the story and use gestures to depict the action.

      The mood changes as all members of the ensemble run downstage representing the victims trying to escape. This leaves Candidate 1 standing in the doorway as Hindley arrives (Candidate 4) once more. The ensemble wipe red paint on her signifying death. The use of flashing stage lights and a heartbeat sound effect add to the tension. This section comes to a climax as they drop the frame to the floor and trap one of the victims. There is long blackout of 20 seconds, which undermines the power of the previous scene.

      The next scene starts when Candidate 3 takes the lead as one of the victims. She has a monologue and the ensemble use mime to tell the story. This shows a well-thought-out use of physicality.  The scene ends with an inventive way to use the frame as it is dragged to the back of the stage to trap the next victim.

      The next blackout is  11 seconds long. The lights come up on a spilt scene with a mother of one of the victims (played by Candidate 2). They create the tension with dynamics and physicality. This is all underscored with the Christmas carol, The Little Drummer Boy. The heartbeat sound effect here is dramatic as the character dies.  There is another blackout.

      The last scene begins 15 seconds later and the ensemble stand spaced out on stage shouting the names of the victims, followed by the words ‘Hindley Wakes’ (the title of the piece). The piece ends on an emotional high with the question being posed to the audience by Hindley, “What have I done?”, rather than offering a final solution.


    • Candidates

    • Candidates in the order they present themselves


      Candidates in order of merit

      Candidate

      A Response to stimulus

      (5 marks)

      B Ensemble, structure, role

      (15 marks)

      C Quality of analysis and evaluation

      (10 marks)

      Total mark awarded

      (30 marks)

      Candidate 1

      5

      12

      8

      25

      Candidate 4

      4

      11

      9

      24

      Candidate 3

      4

      11

      8

      23

      Candidate 5

      4

      10

      9

      23

      Candidate 2

      3

      9

      6

      18



    • Devised piece: Candidate 1

      This video has been anonymised so the candidate names have been removed at the start. The audio starts at approximately 00:05 secs.

      • Candidate 1 - Evaluation



      Devised piece: Candidate 4

      This video has been anonymised so the candidate names have been removed at the start. The audio starts at approximately 00:05 secs.

      • Candidate 4 - Evaluation


      Devised piece: Candidate 3

      This video has been anonymised so the candidate names have been removed at the start. The audio starts at approximately 00:05 secs.
      Devised piece: Candidate 5 

      This video has been anonymised so the candidate names have been removed at the start. The audio starts at approximately 00:05 secs.

      • Candidate 5 - Evaluation



      Devised piece: Candidate 2

      This video has been anonymised so the candidate names have been removed at the start. The audio starts at approximately 00:05 secs.

    • Part 2 Scripted performance (30 marks)

      Scripted performance - 'Attempts on Her Life'

      This video has been anonymised so the candidate names have been removed at the start. The audio starts at 00:17 secs.


      /div>
    • Commentary on scripted performance
    • Attempts on her Life (1997) is Martin Crimp's most famous play. It is a piece of experimental theatre in which there is no indication of which characters are meant to deliver which lines or even how many actors should be on stage at once.  There are no stage directions.  

      Crimp has described the play as consisting of ‘17 scenarios for the theatre’. Although there are narrative elements to each of these scenarios, the play does not have an overall linear narrative. There is an implied character, Anne, who never appears on stage and by implication all of the scenarios are attacks on her individuality.

      The dialogue consists mainly of short fragments in contrasting styles and voices. The actors/director have the responsibility for completing the gaps in the drama to produce a finished work, which means that each staging of the play is likely to be quite different.

      This performance consists of a group of six candidates, who perform three sections of the play (1, 11 and 12)

      The maximum group size allowed by the syllabus is five. However, in this case the centre was given permission to perform in a group of six as a result of circumstances affected by Covid 19.

      Please note that a number of obscene words have been cut out to suit an audience watching in a school.

      The piece lasts approximately 17 minutes.  The syllabus states that the scripted piece should be between 10 and 25 minutes.  However, since this is an ensemble piece, the candidates have suitable exposure time, nevertheless. 

      Section 1 - ALL MESSAGES DELETED

      starts at  27 secs

      8:41 mins long

      Section 11 - UNTITLED (100 WORDS)

      starts at  9:14  mins

      7:22 mins long

      Section 12 - STRANGELY!

      starts at 16:36 mins

      1:03 mins long

      There are no stage directions in the script. The candidates have staged the performance creatively using inventive lighting, space and physicality. There is a solid sense of ensemble throughout and each candidate has sufficient exposure time.

      Section 1

      The opening stage picture has the key character at the front, explores different levels and is effectively lit. The candidate with the opening monologue, Candidate 3, scores the highest mark. She uses exaggerated movement and vocalisation and sets the tone of the piece from the outset. The scene unfolds with flexible ensemble groupings and good use of space.

      There is a lengthy blackout lasting 26 seconds, which stops the flow of the piece.

      However, the following section picks up energy as the candidates move purposefully around the stage and physicalise the dialogue. They do this while the second monologue is presented in an effective story-telling way by Candidate 1 (second highest mark).

      There is another blackout, a feature of the performance. The group has decided to insert long blackouts before the lengthier monologues and this affects the energy. However, they do pick up the pace each time following the blackouts.

      The use of spotlights is effective to highlight each candidate when they perform the shorter answer phone messages.  These are subsequently interjected between the full-group montages to add contrast. 

      Another creative feature of the performance is when the ensemble hum to underscore a monologue.

      The pace quickens and the dynamic increases as the dialogue becomes more offensive and threatening. The candidates have replaced some dialogue, but the choice of words has a similar effect. Combined with the creative staging decisions, this is successful.

      The ensemble lift Candidate 2 (the lowest marked candidate)

      Section 11

      Candidate 3 (top candidate) starts this scene communicating well with the other actors as well as with the audience.

      There is more unison movement in this scene with a continued physicalisation of the dialogue by the ensemble. The script has been divided up between the candidates and they engage effectively with the more narrative style of this scene.

      The ensemble repeats the chanting of individual words with suitable gestures and a range of levels.

      A red cloth is bought out to symbolise the punishment of the artist who is creating ‘degenerate art’, a term used by the Nazi Party. The cloth is then thrown away in a dynamic fashion when they say the words, ‘Isn’t that the true meaning of these attempts on her life?’, re-calling the play’s title. This is an inventive way to visualise the historical reference to degenerate art in the script.

      The scene is then cut at this point, and the performance moves immediately to section 12 which starts following a long blackout.

      Section 12

      A lighting change signifies the start of this scene. A sense of urgency is created by a strong ensemble approach, reinforced by choral speaking. Although the ensemble perform only one page of this scene, the cuts are logical, and the piece is well-structured. There is a sense of conclusion at the end.

    • Candidates
    • Candidates in the order they present themselves


      Candidates in order of merit

      Candidate name

      Interpretation and performance skills

      (15 marks)

      Communication

      (15 marks)

      Total

      (30 marks)

      Candidate 3

      14

      15

      29

      Candidate 1

      14

      14

      28

      Candidate 4

      13

      13

      26

      Candidate 6

      13

      13

      26

      Candidate 5

      13

      12

      25

      Candidate 2

      9

      10

      19




    • Scripted performance: Candidate 3

      Scripted performance: Candidate 6

      Scripted performance: Candidate 5