Section outline

    • Low level response

    • Part 1 - Presentation

      Content and presentation

      The candidate covered their topic well. They made relevant factual points with some ideas and opinions.  There were a few problems of comprehension, at times. Responses for the first part were generally good as the topic was prepared well beforehand. Some were adequate responses, but the candidate relied on using English words to carry on with the flow of conversation. They responded thoughtfully and mostly coped well with unexpected questions during all parts of the test.

      Quality of language

      The candidate used a sufficient range of vocabulary but sometimes lacked precision. Vocabulary errors did not impede communication. Pronunciation and intonation were generally clear. However, the candidate used English words quite often to keep the communication going.

       The candidate generally used a mixture of simple and complex structures, however, errors occurred often when they tried to use complex structures accurately. Errors did not impede communication .

      Mark for Content and presentation = 7 out of 10

      Mark for Quality of language = 7 out of 10

      Total mark awarded = 14 out of 20

    • Part 2 - Topic Conversation

      Conduct of the test

      The teacher/examiner created a comfortable environment initially to help the candidate overcome exam nerves.

      The teacher/examiner listened to the candidate attentively during the presentation. They always linked the conversation to the presentation by asking relevant questions to help the candidate reach their potential by paraphrasing before asking questions.

      Candidate response

      There were adequate responses, but the candidate relied on using English words to carry on with the flow of conversation. They responded thoughtfully and mostly coped well with unexpected questions during all parts of the test.

      The candidate generally used a mixture of simple and complex structures, however, errors occurred often when they tried to use complex structures accurately. Errors did not impede communication .

      Mark for Comprehension and responsiveness = 8 out of 10

      Mark for Quality of language = 7 out of 5

      Total mark awarded = 15 out of 20


    • Part 3 - General Conversation

      Conduct of the test

      The teacher/examiner led the discussion and covered two-three topics- weather, holidays from topic area E and how to maintain good health from topic area A which met the requirement set by the syllabus.

      The Teacher/examiner asked good questions skilfully to utilise the candidate’s potential. For example, they started the question on weather and when they realised the conversation may diminish, they moved on to visiting places and what preparation was needed prior to travel. The discussion flowed naturally into a new topic.

      Different tenses were covered.

      The correct timings were adhered to.                                                                                                                                                                                                    

      Candidate response

      The candidate understood the discussion around basic situations and concepts but had difficulty with more complex ideas at times. They responded relevantly and at a length to most questions.

      Mark for Comprehension and responsiveness = 8 out of 10

      Mark for Quality of language = 7 out of 10

      Total mark awarded = 15 out of 20

    • Moderator comments - Whole test

      Conduct of the test

      • The test was conducted well. The teacher/examiner had read the guidelines to conduct the test prior to the test. At the start of the examination, they gave all the necessary details about the exam and the candidate clearly understood, which is good practice. The teacher/examiner created a comfortable environment initially to help the candidate overcome exam nerves. 
      • The teacher/examiner listened to the candidate attentively during the presentation. They always linked the conversation to the presentation by asking relevant questions to help the candidate reach their potential by paraphrasing before asking questions.
      • For part three, the teacher/examiner led the discussion and covered two-three topics- weather, holidays from topic area E and how to maintain good health from topic area A which met the requirement set by the syllabus. 

      • The Teacher/examiner asked good questions skilfully to utilise the candidate’s potential. For example, they started the question on weather and when they realised the conversation may diminish, they moved on to visiting places and what preparation was needed prior to travel. The discussion flowed naturally into a new topic.
      • The correct timings were adhered to.                                                                                                                                                                                                   

      Candidate response

      The candidate covered their topic well. They made relevant factual points with some ideas and opinions.  There were a few problems of comprehension, at times.

       Responses were varied, depending on the topic. Responses for the first part were generally good as the topic was prepared well beforehand. Some were adequate responses, but the candidate relied on using English words to carry on with the flow of conversation. They responded thoughtfully and mostly coped well with unexpected questions during all parts of the test.

      The candidate understood the discussion around basic situations and concepts but had difficulty with more complex ideas at times. They responded relevantly and at a length to most questions.

      The candidate used a sufficient range of vocabulary but sometimes lacked precision. Vocabulary errors did not impede communication. Pronunciation and intonation were generally clear. However, the candidate used English words quite often to keep the communication going.

       The candidate generally used a mixture of simple and complex structures, however, errors occurred often when they tried to use complex structures accurately. Errors did not impede communication.

      Total mark awarded = 44 out of 60