Section outline

    • Middle level response 

    • Part 1 - Presentation

      Content and presentation
      There was good coverage and sound organisation of the topic. The candidate presented their topic clearly and made relevant factual points with some ideas and opinions. The candidate was able to present and defend a point of view.

       The candidate showed sustained ability to initiate and maintain conversation and to contribute at reasonable length.

      Quality of language

      The candidate used a sufficient range of vocabulary, which sometimes lacked accuracy, but vocabulary errors did not impede communication. Pronunciation and intonation were generally clear.

       The candidate used simple structures and a sufficient range of complex structures. Grammatical errors occurred when they tried to use complex structures. However, errors did not impede communication. Explicit examples were given in the moderator’s comments.

      Mark for Content and presentation = 8 out of 10

      Mark for Quality of language = 9 out of 10

      Total mark awarded = 17 out of 20

    • Part 2 - Topic Conversation

      Conduct of the test

      The examiner listens to the candidate’ s presentation attentively and asks relevant and appropriate questions on the topic covered in part one. 

      The teacher/examiner prompted the candidate during the presentation and sometimes during other parts of the test to show they were listening. Paraphrasing was also used by the teacher/examiner to reiterate what the candidate had said which helped the candidate to focus.

      Two questions were similar, it is good practice to avoid repeating similar questions.

      Candidate response

      The candidate used a sufficient range of vocabulary, which sometimes lacked accuracy, but vocabulary errors did not impede communication. Pronunciation and intonation were generally clear.

      The candidate used simple structures and a sufficient range of complex structures. Grammatical errors occurred when they tried to use complex structures. However, errors did not impede communication. Explicit examples were given in the moderator’s comments.

      Mark for Comprehension and responsiveness = 9 out of 10

      Mark for Quality of language= 7 out of 10

      Total mark awarded = 16 out of 20

    • Part 3 - General Conversation


      Conduct of the test

      Two areas were covered successfully for part three of the test: health and fitness from area A and places and customs from area E.

      However, some of the questions could have been broken down into small questions to help the flow of discussion. At least two-time frames were covered by the candidate.

      Candidate response

      The candidate showed sustained ability to initiate and maintain conversation and to contribute at reasonable length.

       There were a few problems of comprehension, but the teacher/examiner’s interest was sustained for all three parts of the test.

       The candidate responses were a best fit within the ‘good’ band of the mark scheme set by Cambridge.

      Mark for Comprehension and responsiveness = 8 out of 10

      Mark for Quality of language = 8 out of 10

      Total mark awarded = 16 out of 20

    • Moderator comments - Whole test

      Conduct of the test

      • The Speaking Test was conducted well.
      • The teacher/examiner clearly introduced the candidate at the start of the test.
      •  The quality of recording was good.
      • Timings were adhered to.
      • The teacher/examiner seemed well prepared for the conduct of the examination. 
      • It is evident that the teacher/examiner read the guidelines provided by Cambridge prior to conducting the speaking test and they were confident of the requirements of all part of the test.
      • The examiner listens to the candidate’ s presentation attentively and asks relevant and appropriate questions on the topic covered in part one. 
      • The teacher/examiner prompted the candidate during the presentation and sometimes during other parts of the test to show they were listening. Paraphrasing was also used by the teacher/examiner to reiterate what the candidate had said which helped the candidate to focus. 
      • Two areas were covered successfully for part three of the test: health and fitness from area A and places and customs from area E.
      • However, some of the questions could have been broken down into small questions to help the flow of discussion. At least two-time frames were covered by the candidate. 

      Candidate response

      There was good coverage and sound organisation of the topic. The candidate presented their topic clearly and made relevant factual points with some ideas and opinions. The candidate was able to present and defend a point of view. 

      The candidate showed sustained ability to initiate and maintain conversation and to contribute at reasonable length. 

      There were a few problems of comprehension, but the teacher/examiner’s interest was sustained for all three parts of the test. 

      The candidate responses were a best fit within the ‘good’ band of the mark scheme set by Cambridge. 

      The candidate used a sufficient range of vocabulary, which sometimes lacked accuracy, but vocabulary errors did not impede communication. Pronunciation and intonation were generally clear. 

      The candidate used simple structures and a sufficient range of complex structures. Grammatical errors occurred when they tried to use complex structures. However, errors did not impede communication. Explicit examples were given in the moderator’s comments.

      Total mark awarded = 49 out of 60