Section outline
-
-
Moderator comments
Conduct of the test
The test was managed effectively, with the teacher/examiner providing clear instructions and using alternative questions appropriately when needed. The pacing was good, and the teacher/examiner maintained a supportive approach throughout.
Some questions were repeated appropriately when the candidate appeared confused.
However, the teacher/examiner could have used more varied extension prompts to better encourage the candidate to elaborate on their responses.
Roleplay
Mark for task 1 = 2 out of 2
Mark for task 2 = 0 out of 2
Mark for task 3 = 2 out of 2
Mark for task 4 = 2 out of 2
Mark for task 5 = 2 out of 2
Total mark for Roleplay = 8 out of 10
Topic conversations 1 and 2
Candidate response
Communication
The candidate:
- faced challenges with some questions but consistently attempts to provide answers.
- conveyed some simple and relevant information related to the questions.
- demonstrated understanding of most questions but had limited ability to develop ideas or provide detailed answers.
- frequently required repetition and the use of alternative questions for support.
- showed occasional comprehension difficulties, particularly with more complex questions.
Quality of Language
The candidate:
- used a limited range of vocabulary and sentence structures.
- made frequent errors that sometimes affected the clarity of communication.
- demonstrated basic pronunciation that was generally understandable, though it required some effort.
- exhibited noticeable hesitation and a fragmented delivery style.
- relied on simple sentence patterns and made frequent grammatical errors.
Mark for Quality of Language = 6 out of 15
Mark for Content = 6 out of 15
Total mark awarded = 20 out of 40