Task completion and communication
- Completes all tasks fully and confidently:
The candidate addresses each prompt in detail,
providing clear and structured responses. He covers the pros and cons of
joining clubs, the impact of volunteering, the reasons some people might not
want to volunteer, and the relationship between volunteering and the sense of responsibility.
- Communicates
relevant information with clear and supported ideas and opinions:
The candidate’s
answers are relevant and provide well-supported ideas and opinions. For
example, he discusses both the benefits and drawbacks of joining clubs and
provides a personal example to illustrate the connection between volunteering
and the sense of responsibility.
- Develops a justified argument:
The candidate
generally develops his arguments clearly, providing justifications and
examples to support his points. For instance, he explains how volunteer work
can alleviate staffing pressures in the hospitals and the schools, and why
some people might not choose to volunteer. The meaning of volunteering was
well elaborated.
- Fully engages in the conversation:
The candidate
engages thoroughly with the examiner, responding promptly and fully to all
questions and prompts. He maintains a good level of interaction throughout the
conversation.
- 加入社团的优点和缺点(Joining clubs'
advantages and disadvantages):
The candidate discusses both advantages (enrich
learning, expand horizons and interpersonal development) and disadvantages
(impact on academic time) clearly and thoroughly, meeting the criteria for a
justified argument.
- 你对做志愿者的看法(Your view on volunteering):
The candidate articulates a clear and positive
view on volunteers, highlighting their selflessness and societal
contributions, which aligns with the criteria for communicating clear and
supported ideas.
- 有些人不愿意做志愿者，是什么原因？(Why some people are unwilling to volunteer):
The candidate mentions personal commitments as
a reason, providing a valid explanation. While the point could be further
expanded, it still addresses the prompt sufficiently.
- 志愿活动对社会的影响 (Impact of volunteer activities on society):
The candidate gives a detailed explanation of
how volunteer work supports societal development, using specific examples like
hospitals to illustrate his point.
- 在你住的地方哪些人最需要志愿者的帮助？(Who needs volunteer assistance the most in
your area):
The candidate identifies hospitals and schools
as needing volunteers and provides reasons for these needs, demonstrating a
good understanding of the prompt.
- 做义工和责任感的关系 (The relationship between volunteering and a
sense of responsibility):
The candidate explains the connection between
volunteering and responsibility well, using a personal anecdote to support his
argument, which aligns with the criteria for a justified argument.
- 做义工会让你成为一个更好的公民吗？(Will volunteering make you a better citizen?):
The candidate provides a nuanced view, arguing
that volunteering alone does not make one a better citizen and emphasizing the
importance of genuine intention and responsibility, demonstrating depth in his
response.
Language range
- Linking and cohesive devices: The candidate uses a range of linking and cohesive
devices to structure their answers and connect ideas. This includes terms such
as "首先" (firstly),
"并且"
(and),
"例如" (for
example), and "并不是说" (not saying that). For this part of the exam, these devices are used effectively to maintain
coherence.
- Vocabulary: The vocabulary is appropriate and well-chosen for
the context. The candidate uses relevant terms related to the topic of
volunteering and social impact, such as "人际关系" (interpersonal relationship), "社会发展"
(social development), and "缓解压力" (alleviate pressure). In the context of
AS level, this demonstrates a good grasp of the topic-specific vocabulary.
- Variation and repetition: Although some repetition occurs, the candidate
manages to convey his ideas clearly and cohesively. The ability to vary
sentence structures and avoid excessive repetition is present, and this level
of variation is commendable given the almost impromptu nature of
the task.
Mark awarded = 10 out of 10
Language accuracy
- Simple
grammar: The candidate uses simple
grammar accurately throughout most of the conversation. Basic sentence
structures and grammatical rules are consistently followed.
- Complex
grammar: While there are occasional
slips and some not so precise phrasing, these
do not significantly impede communication. The candidate demonstrates a good
grasp of complex grammatical structures and is generally able to convey his ideas effectively.
- Minor
errors and communication: Errors, such as "不懈千里"， "做义工，他并不是为了某一个回报," are
present but are relatively minor and do not detract from the overall clarity of
communication. The candidate's ability to convey his
points clearly and engage in the conversation supports the higher mark.
- Consistency: The candidate's language
accuracy is consistent and shows a good degree of control, even with complex
structures. Errors are infrequent and do not hinder the overall effectiveness
of the communication.
Mark awarded = 10 out of 10
Total mark awarded for Conversation task card = 30 out of 30
Pronunciation and intonation for the whole speaking test
Pronunciation
is intelligible and intonation is appropriate. Individual sounds are
articulated clearly.
Mark awarded = 5 out of 5
Total mark awarded for Speaking test = 63 out of 65