Section outline

◄Topic 4
►Topic 6
    • Middle level response

    • Transcript Middle File
      113.6 KB
    • Section 1: Presentation

    • Content and Presentation: The candidate provided an adequate exposition of the topic, demonstrating clear evidence of preparation. They presented relevant factual points along with some personal opinions. However, the presentation would have been more engaging with a greater display of enthusiasm, which could have helped capture and maintain the teacher/examiner’s interest more effectively.

      Mark awarded = 6 out of 10


      Pronunciation and Intonation: Although there are quite a few errors, there is a fair degree of accuracy and some attempt at intonation and expression.

      Mark awarded = 3 out of 5

       

      Language: There is occasional hesitation, but there is no ambiguity in meaning.   

      Mark awarded = 3 out of 5


      Total mark awarded for Presentation = 12 out of 20

    • Section 2: Topic Conversation

    • Comprehension & Responsiveness: The candidate demonstrated a few difficulties with comprehension, but effectively asked questions to clarify meaning when needed. They responded thoughtfully and handled unexpected questions well. While the candidate was reasonably forthcoming, they tended to follow the teacher/examiner’s lead rather than steering the conversation more independently.

      Mark awarded = 7 out of 10


      Accuracy: Although there are signs of significant gaps in grammatical usage, the candidate can express themselves without ambiguity and convey meaningful responses.

      Mark awarded = 5 out of 10

       

      Feel for the Language: The candidate’s feel for the language is evident, although thought processes and expression are influenced by their mother tongue.

      Mark awarded = 5 out of 10 

       

      Providing Information and Opinions: The limitations of vocabulary and structures restrict the discussion. It is noticeable that the candidate has interesting ideas to share but can’t express themselves more fluently. 

      Mark awarded = 2 out of 5

       

      Seeking Information and Opinions: The candidate asks two questions for clarification.   

      Mark awarded = 3 out of 5


      Total mark awarded for Topic conversation = 22 out of 40

    • Section 3: General Conversation

    • Comprehension & Responsiveness: The candidate responds thoughtfully, asks questions to clarify comprehension and copes well with unexpected questions. They are able to share interesting ideas and somehow overcome the gaps in vocabulary and grammar when discussing the questions.

      Mark awarded = 7 out of 10

       

      Accuracy: Although there are signs of significant gaps in grammatical usage, the candidate can express themselves without ambiguity and convey meaningful responses.

      Mark awarded = 5 out of 10

       

      Feel for the Language: Again, the candidate’s feel for the language is evident, although thought processes and expression are influenced by their mother tongue.

      Mark awarded = 5 out of 10

       

      Providing Information and Opinions: Although there is a limitation in the expression of ideas due to limitations in range of vocabulary and structures, the candidate can express themselves with no ambiguity.

      Mark awarded = 3 out of 5

       

      Seeking Information and Opinions: The candidate asked at least four spontaneous questions that arose naturally during the conversation and were relevant to the topic. Although the format of the questions was somewhat limited, the intended meaning was effectively conveyed, allowing the conversation to flow smoothly.

      Mark awarded = 4 out of 5


      Total mark awarded for General conversation = 24 out of 40


      Total mark awarded for Speaking test = 58 out of 100

    • Moderator comments (Whole test)

      Conduct of the test:
      The test was conducted effectively, with the teacher/examiner providing a proper introduction to both the centre and the candidate. Time management was excellent, and the teacher/examiner maintained a polite and engaging manner throughout. They demonstrated genuine interest in the conversation, offering meaningful insights and asking a variety of relevant questions.

      How the examiner performance could improve:

      The teacher/examiner could have encouraged the candidate to ask questions in section 2 and 3. Although the candidate asks a number of questions, they are intended to clarify the meaning, and not to ask questions to the teacher/examiner about the topic.
      How the candidate performance could improve:

      The candidate could enhance their grammar skills to avoid basic errors, such as issues with gender and number agreement. Additionally, their pronunciation is significantly influenced by their mother tongue. While it is evident that the candidate has meaningful insights to share, these fundamental mistakes hindered the clarity of their speech. By expanding their vocabulary, the candidate could have exhibited greater confidence during the test.
◄Topic 4
►Topic 6