Section outline

    • Moderator comments

      SPEAKING ASSESSMENT D (Teacher's Notes 31) was chosen by the teacher/examiner. Topics include your local area and a sports event

      Conduct of the test

      • The test was well conducted in terms of timing, the teacher/examiner’s voice was clear and easy to understand, and she kept to the script. However, she didn’t fully engage with the candidate.
      • The teacher/examiner did not extend any of the questions by responding to the candidate’s answers to the questions and, on two occasions, interrupted him as the time was up. There was probably too much focus on timing to allow a good flow of discussion.

      Grammar

      • The candidate used a range of simple structures mostly accurately. Errors sometimes occurred when he attempted more complex structures ‘but the world of the footballer is very influenced also for the economy of the the nation’, but not always ‘it’s a good sport because you can experience a lot of er... different conditions in interacting with other people and also erm... facing other opponents.
      • Although the candidate showed ambition in attempting complex structures, particularly in the use of the passive, errors in subject/verb agreement, use of prepositions, use of articles, verb tenses limited his mark to 7.

      Mark for grammar = 7 out of 10

      Vocabulary

      The candidate used a sufficient range of everyday and subject specific vocabulary to discuss a variety of ideas, facts and opinions. E.g. to face the other, an intellectual race against you, mental ability, improve the behaviour of the individual, passion in their hearts, to interact.  

      Mark for vocabulary = 8 out of 10

      Development

      • The candidate mainly understood the questions asked and his responses were relevant and mostly developed.
      • Communication was maintained without support as this was not forthcoming from the teacher/examiner.
      • The candidate’s response to Question 4 Part 3 was a little confusing, but the gist of his response was easily understood.

      Mark for development = 8 out of 10

      Pronunciation

      The candidate had quite a strong Italian accent, however, his pronunciation was mostly clear, and intonation was sometimes used to convey intended meaning.

      Mark for pronunciation = 8 out of 10

      Total mark awarded = 31 out of 40