Topic outline

  • Simple test - equivalent to the separate page - but as this is a completely separate Moodle course, this seems to display differently to a page within a course

    • This video is a submission for more than one candidate and is filmed in such a way as Cambridge would expect a centre to submit their candidate evidence (by activity and not as individual candidates). However, the moderator comments for this video refer to the performance of one candidate only.

      The candidate is identified in the moderator commentary displayed in the video below: green bib 5.

      This candidate would be placed in the mid-high Level 5 range.

      When placing the candidate in Level 5, consider the technique, accuracy and consistency in performing the skills to a very good level in rallies and in a game.

      Remember to check that the assessment conditions for this level have been met.


      Some issues seen with Badminton from some centres:

      • Video evidence shows a candidate serving over a net with no opposition. The skill is performed in isolation and therefore only meets the Level 2 assessment criteria.
      • Candidates play against an opponent of a much lower ability. This allows their attacking skills to be seen but not how they turn a defensive situation into an attack.
      • The candidate is not seen performing a serve.
      • Angles are not used when creating attacking situations; the play is only down the centre of the court.
      • Neither the result nor the angle of the candidate’s shot is seen. 
      • Candidates often demonstrate skills in isolation and then show a game. Very few candidates are filmed demonstrating sequences (such as short serve, lift, overhead clear and smash) as unopposed drills or as competitive drills.



  • Topic 1

  • Topic 2

  • Topic 3